Software Review Systems Review Testing 
TechEmpower - Product Management
AUGUST 21, 2023
Many CEOs of software-enabled businesses call us with a similar concern: Are we getting the right results from our software team? We hear them explain that their current software development is expensive, deliveries are rarely on time, and random bugs appear. What does a business leader do in this situation?
Split
JULY 13, 2023
The need for efficient and effective software development methodologies has never been more paramount. Amid this incessant search for perfection, two paradigms have become prominent: Test-driven development (TDD) and feature flag-driven development (FFDD). Then, they write the minimum amount of code needed to pass the test.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Atlassian
FEBRUARY 3, 2022
In 1988, Hewlett Packard (HP) conducted an internal review of their software development processes and set a target to improve their code quality tenfold. Eventually, they concluded that incorporating code reviews into the development cycle saved more money than resolving defects after they were found by customers.
The Product Coalition
JANUARY 27, 2024
Software development with sustainability in mind is a rising trend in digital spaces. While software is intangible and doesn’t directly consume energy or produce emissions, its environmental implications lie in its development and usage. As software builders, we are uniquely positioned to influence this environmental trajectory.
Split
APRIL 24, 2024
Managing numerous testing environments poses a significant hurdle in the complex sphere of software development. Test environments are where code becomes a reality. These environments provide a controlled space for testing and refinement before a product is released to end users.
UX Planet
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024
This article reviews 3 popular contribution models: 1. It uses the hybrid model of contribution where the central design system team is responsible for the overall direction. This hybrid model helps the design team keep the system accurate and useful. This hybrid model helps the design team keep the system accurate and useful.
Sachin Rekhi
APRIL 5, 2020
One practice that both companies established was weekly executive-level metrics reviews. SurveyMonkey, on the other hand, had a single meeting called ACER, which stood for acquisition, conversion, engagement, retention, where they covered these funnels across all A/B tests happening in the company. Why metrics reviews matter.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content